- Feel bad for Rick. Development is VERY difficult.
- My overall feeling on much of the inventory for both auctions is that they really lack what domainers and buyers are looking for: premium and brandable generics. Guavas.com is just not going to excite anyone but perhaps Guava.com would because it is also a brandable.
- Two great deals: losangelespersonals.com and lasvegasinsurance.com both went SUPER cheap.
- Not crazy about names like “catfood.com” anymore.
- In regards to above note on GEO domains, it reminds me of last years GEO auction in San Diego. I have a buddy who is working to build his domain business and he asked me for advice. I said michigancarinsurance.com was going to go for a song and he should make sure to snap it up. He bought it for $750 and sold it in a few months later for 5x that amount.
- Despite the flaws in Latonas inventory, the Moniker catalog is worse. LOTS of names we’ve seen over and over again. It is becoming a reoccuring theme and good sign for domainers holding high quality, low exposure domains.
- I’ve been saying it for years, a successful auction relies on ONE thing: quality of inventory. Yet keep in mind that the definition of ‘quality’ is in constant flux.
- These days access to quality inventory is a matter of trust.
- DDN oversaturated and underpriced the GEO market, leading to sales as mentioned above which are well below what an end-user could afford or is willing to pay.


#1 by Raffaele Della Peruta on February 25, 2010 - 6:02 pm
Quote
“I’ve been saying it for years, a successful auction relies on ONE thing: quality of inventory.”
This is definitley a key factor. Some of the low quality of domain names offered has turned me off paying attention to certain domain auctions.
Unless they fall under the category of .com, .ca(all country domains), .tel, .asia or .eu I’m not interested in the domain names. I wish they would stop with the .biz, .info, .net etc.